Kidney cancer is a malignant tumor occurring in the renal parenchyma. Early symptoms are atypical, often manifesting as hematuria or back pain, but many cases are discovered incidentally during physical examinations. If not diagnosed in time, it may quickly progress to locally advanced or distant metastasis, significantly worsening the prognosis. Comprehensive methods such as ultrasound, CT, MRI, and biopsy can determine the nature and stage of the lesion, providing an important basis for developing individualized treatment plans.
1. Imaging Examination as the First Choice
Imaging plays a central role in kidney cancer diagnosis. Abdominal ultrasound is the initial test, capable of detecting hypoechoic or mixed masses in the kidney. If abnormalities are found, enhanced CT scans should be performed to accurately show tumor size, location, structural characteristics, and venous invasion, which are critical for assessing resectability. MRI is often used to determine invasion of the renal vein or inferior vena cava, with superior fat distribution and soft tissue resolution, especially suitable for patients with contrast allergies or renal insufficiency.
2. Laboratory Tests as Important Supplements
Blood and urine tests, though nonspecific, can provide diagnostic clues. Some patients may present with polycythemia, hypercalcemia, or abnormal liver function. Urinalysis may reveal microscopic hematuria or proteinuria. In addition, renal function indicators such as creatinine and urea nitrogen levels help evaluate the impact of tumors on kidney function and provide guidance for preoperative preparation.
3. Biopsy to Confirm Pathology
For renal lesions suspected on imaging but not definitively diagnosed, percutaneous renal biopsy under CT or ultrasound guidance is a relatively safe method. Histological examination can determine tumor type, such as clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma, or chromophobe carcinoma, helping to select surgical procedures and subsequent treatment directions. If the lesion is benign (such as angiomyolipoma), unnecessary surgical intervention can be avoided.
4. Tumor Marker Testing in Development
Although no highly specific kidney cancer markers exist yet, studies have found that plasma carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), VEGF, and PD-L1 have certain reference value in some subtypes. With the development of immune reconstruction cell therapy, these markers may also serve as important references for evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapy. United Life International Medical Center is exploring marker-assisted screening pathways in individualized diagnosis and treatment.
5. PET-CT for Metastasis Evaluation and Efficacy Monitoring
When distant metastasis is suspected, or tumor response needs to be evaluated after treatment, PET-CT can be used. By showing metabolically active areas, it helps identify micrometastases or recurrent lesions. However, due to the relatively low glucose metabolism of kidney cancer, PET-CT sensitivity is limited and still requires integration with other imaging data for judgment.
6. Clinical Scoring Systems to Assist Decision-Making
Systems such as the Mayo scoring system, TNM staging, and Fuhrman grading are often used to assess malignancy, prognosis, and surgical suitability. Some centers also conduct genetic testing to evaluate sensitivity to targeted or immunotherapies. These multidimensional assessments help doctors develop more precise, individualized treatment strategies.
The diagnosis of kidney cancer cannot rely on a single test but requires combined analysis of imaging, laboratory, and pathology. Experts at United Life International Medical Center emphasize that early systematic evaluation and classification are crucial for choosing appropriate treatments and improving survival quality. The development of novel strategies such as immune cell therapy relies even more on accurate diagnostic foundations.